In a video that recently surfaced on social media, politician Kwabena Agyapong publicly rejected disparaging remarks made by a traditional chief, dismissing the label “sankwas”—a derogatory term used in the exchange.
In the clip, Agyapong strongly refuted the insult, arguing that such language is unbecoming of anyone holding a chieftaincy title.
The incident has sparked widespread attention online, with many calling into question the decorum expected of traditional leaders. Agyapong’s reaction underscores concerns about respect, civility, and the standards of public discourse — especially when figures of authority resort to insults.
Supporters of the politician have rallied around him, condemning what they view as an unwarranted attack on his character, while others are calling for greater accountability and dignity from traditional authorities.
The controversy highlights broader issues about respect and responsibility in public dialogue, particularly when it involves influential figures and cultural leaders. As the video gains traction, many observers are watching closely to see how both sides respond — and what this might mean for relationships between political personalities and traditional institutions moving forward.
“If he does not respect himself, we respect ourselves.”
Ing. Kwabena Agyei Agyapong, an aspiring presidential candidate of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has sharply criticised Nana Boadi Amponim Abodade III, describing the chief’s recent comments as disrespectful and unbecoming.
