• About Us
  • Photo Gallery
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
Monday, September 29, 2025
Republic Online
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Republic Online
No Result
View All Result
Home General

Ministerial Approval: Supreme Court to hear Dafeamekpor‘s case today

The Supreme Court will later today Wednesday, March 27, 2024, hear a writ filed by Member of Parliament (MP) for South Dayi Rockson-Nelson Etse K. Dafeamekpor which seeks the Apex Court to restrain the Speaker of Parliament and the House from approving newly appointed ministers of state.

Andy Frimpong Manso by Andy Frimpong Manso
March 27, 2024
in General, Lead story, Local News, News, Review, Top Stories
0 0
0
It’s unconstitutional for chiefs to endorse candidates and political parties – Supreme Court
0
SHARES
219
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court will later today Wednesday, March 27, 2024, hear a writ filed by Member of Parliament (MP) for South Dayi Rockson-Nelson Etse K. Dafeamekpor which seeks the Apex Court to restrain the Speaker of Parliament and the House from approving newly appointed ministers of state.

The MP who is the Plaintiff in a writ filed on March 18, 2024, against the Speaker of Parliament and the Attorney General is contending that, a declaration of any Ministerial appointment which has not been subject to prior Parliamentary approval is in direct violation of Article 78(1) of the 1992 Constitution which states that “a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament” hence the failure of the President to refer some of his re-assigned Ministers to Parliament violates provisions of the 1992 Constitution.

The South Dayi lawmaker is also seeking 11 reliefs which comprised of seven declarations and four orders.

“An order directing the President of the Republic of Ghana to submit to Parliament for approval, the names of the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked or terminated on the 14th of February, 2024 and who were subsequently supposedly re-assigned to other Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices for purposes of appointment as Ministers of State and Deputy Minister of State.

“An order of interlocutory injunction restraining the Speaker of Parliament, the 1st Defendant herein, from proceeding with the vetting and approval of the names of the nominees of the President submitted to Parliament until the requirement that a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament is satisfied in respect to the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked on the 14th of February, 2024 have been re-assigned new Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices.

“An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Speaker of Parliament, 1st Defendant herein, from proceeding with the vetting and approval of the names of the nominees of the Presidential submitted to Parliament until the requirement that a Minister of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament, satisfied in respect to the Ministers of State and the Deputy Minister of State whose appointments were revoked on the 14th of February, 2024 and have been re-assigned new Ministerial and Deputy Ministerial offices.”

The legal action taken by the Member of Parliament described by many as “unnecessary” is as a result of a letter sent to Parliament by the secretary to the President preventing Parliament from submitting the anti-gay bill for the President’s assent.

The bill since passed by Parliament has raised several concerns with some international and local organizations urging the President not to assent.

However, the Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame who is the second defendant argues that the substance of Dafeamekpor’s suit is a challenge to the power of the President to relieve ministers serving in his government of their portfolios and reassign them to different Ministries, adding that it has no bearing on the approval of persons newly nominated by the President as Ministers and Deputy Ministers and duly presented to Parliament for approval in accordance with articles 78(1) and 79(1) of the Constitution.

Meanwhile, a seven-member panel is expected to deal with this Constitutional matter.

Tags: Anti Gay BillAttorney GeneralMinisterial approvalRockson Nelson DafeamekporSouth Dayi MPSpeaker of ParliamentSupreme Court




NEWSLETTER

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion

© 2021 All Rights Reserved myrepubliconline.

Verified by MonsterInsights