• About Us
  • Photo Gallery
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Republic Online
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Republic Online
No Result
View All Result
Home General

Supreme Court directs Richard Sky to file injunction request on anti-LGBTQ+ Bill again

The Supreme Court has adjourned Richard Sky’s application seeking a declaration that the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-gay bill, is null, void, and of no effect to May 17, 2024.

Andy Frimpong Manso by Andy Frimpong Manso
May 8, 2024
in General, Lead story, Local News, News, Politics, Review, Top Stories
0 0
0
Supreme Court dismisses Dafeamekpor’s application against approval of new ministers
0
SHARES
165
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court has directed Richard Sky to file another injunction request on the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly known as the anti-gay bill by May 17, 2024.

After several deliberations by the lawyers, Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo adjourned the case to enable counsel for the plaintiff to “file a fresh motion paper with supporting affidavit and statement of case.

“By listening to all the counsels, the court agrees with the suggestion of counsel for the first defendant and orders the plaintiff applicant to file a fresh motion paper with supporting affidavit and statement of the case. Plaintiff is also given leave to address any matters of fact and issues of law in the new process.

“Plaintiff applicant is given up to May 17, so now you have moved from May 9 to file the new process on May 17, 2024. Counsel for defendants are given seven days after service on them to file any processes that they may wish to”, she said.

However, in the Plaintiff’s suit, he “is seeking the apex court to declare the Bill null and void also contended that the passage of the bill violates provisions of the 1992 Constitution particularly Article 33(5) as well as Articles 12(1) and (2), 15(1), 17(1) and (2), 18(2), and 21(1) (a) (b) (d) and (e) of the Constitution.”

Mr. Sky, also a journalist is seeking eight reliefs including an order that “the Speaker of Parliament contravened Article 108(a)(ii) of the Constitution, in light of Article 296(a)(b) and (c), by admitting and allowing Parliament to proceed upon and pass, ‘The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2024’ into law as the same imposes a charge upon the Consolidated Fund or other public funds of Ghana.”

Meanwhile, the apex court is also hearing a similar case filed by a researcher, Dr Amanda Odoi challenging the passage of the anti-LGBTQ+ bill.

Tags: Her Ladyship Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey TorkornooHuman Sexual Rights and Family Values BillRichard SkySpeaker of ParliamentSupreme Court




NEWSLETTER

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Showbiz
  • Sports
  • Foreign
  • Coronavirus
  • Opinion

© 2021 All Rights Reserved myrepubliconline.

Verified by MonsterInsights