The Judicial Service has refuted reports suggesting that judicial transfers are being used to disrupt cases, describing such claims as misleading and baseless.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, December 2, the Communications Directorate of the Judicial Service emphasized that judicial transfers are routine administrative processes, not tools to truncate ongoing trials.

The statement specifically addressed media reports alleging that Justice Priscilla Dikro Ofori, who was presiding over the criminal trial of Alex Kwabena Safo Kantanka, was transferred just as she was about to deliver judgment.

The Judicial Service clarified that Justice Ofori, like all judges on transfer, has submitted a list of all outstanding judgments and rulings, which she has been authorized to deliver.

Additionally, on November 29, 2024, she submitted a Case Completion Plan, enabling her to conclude cases close to completion.

“Transfers within the judiciary are conducted annually or as necessitated by specific circumstances involving judges or the courts they serve.

These transfers are standard administrative procedures and are not intended to disrupt cases,” the statement read.

The Judicial Service highlighted that judges who are transferred are required to submit a completion plan to the Office of the Chief Justice, allowing them to finalize rulings and deliver judgments on cases they have heard to near completion.

Justice Ofori’s transfer, from Kumasi to Accra, is part of the 2024 legal year reassignments, which involve more than 20 judges across all court levels.

The Service stressed that the transfer process ensures continuity and justice, rejecting any claims of interference.

“The Judicial Service of Ghana hereby reiterates that transfers are not done or intended to truncate cases.

It is hoped that the above-stated facts will afford members of the public the correct perspective on the issue of transfers in the judiciary generally and the said judge in particular,” the statement added.

In its response, the Judicial Service also urged media outlets to verify information before publication, underscoring the need for factual and balanced reporting.

“The Judicial Service further entreats members of the media to painstakingly cross-check their facts and verify information, so as to carry factual and balanced reports to the public,” the statement concluded.

The Service’s clarification comes amidst public concerns fueled by speculative media reports.

However, it reiterated its commitment to transparency and the administration of justice without interruptions.